Case Report
Isolated infarct of the corpus callosum: About a case
1 Radiology Department, Speciality Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
Address correspondence to:
Sara Habib Chorfa
Radiology Department, Speciality Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat
Morocco
Access full text article on other devices
Access PDF of article on other devices
Article ID: 101457Z01SC2024
doi: 10.5348/101457Z01SC2024CR
How to cite this article
Chorfa SH, El Graini S, Sidki K, Touarssa F, Jiddane M. Isolated infarct of the corpus callosum: About a case. Int J Case Rep Images 2024;15(1):107–110.ABSTRACT
We report here the case of an isolated corpus callosum (CC) infarct in a 48-year-old woman. Characteristics of this unusual condition are illustrated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We discuss the clinical signs of this rare entity and the more important differential diagnoses.
Introduction
Infarctions of the corpus callosum (CC) are most often associated with cortical or subcortical ischemic damage [1]. Although its frequency is not precisely known, the occurrence of an isolated infarction of the corpus callosum is a rare event. This rarity makes its recognition difficult, especially since imaging aspects can be misleading and lead to diagnostic errors or invasive procedures [2].
The study of the corpus callosum is always done, initially, in the median sagittal plane, in a T1 or T2 weighted sequence depending on the team. The search for restriction of diffusion, neovascularization on perfusion imaging, and tumor spectrum can be of decisive help. Tractography is of interest in malformative anomalies, traumatic damage, and tumor [1].
The objective of this work is to present the imaging appearance of an isolated infarction of the corpus callosum, to consider the main differential diagnoses and to discuss the clinical particularities.
Case Report
We report here the case of an isolated corpus callosum infarct in a 48-year-old woman with a history of arterial hypertension and hyperlipidemia, hospitalized for sudden onset crural monoparesis with mutism. The clinical examination showed anterograde amnesia, temporospatial disorientation, right hemiparesis, and frontal syndrome (dysexecutive syndrome with impaired judgment, urinary incontinence). There was no impairment of the cranial pairs. The brain MRI showed a subacute infarction of the corpus callosum on complete occlusion of the right distal branches of A2 (Figure 1A–E).

Discussion
The corpus callosum is the most important interhemispheric commissure of the central nervous system. Technical imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), allows a diagnostic approach and follow-up of the pathology of the corpus callosum which is dominated by damage, demyelinating, and vascular. Other causes of corpus callosum involvement may be metabolic, traumatic, tumoral, toxic, and micellar causes.
Acute infarction of the corpus callosum is often manifested by two very distinct clinical pictures: on the one hand, a syndrome of classic dysconnection of the corpus callosum made of ideomotor apraxia of the left hand and constructive apraxia, signs related to the interruption inter-hemispherical beams. And on the other hand, a gait disorder of the frontal type (small steps, U-turn on a pivot, abduction of the arms, etc.).
Involvement of the anterior part of the corpus callosum is often associated with infarction of the columns of the fornix, manifested clinically by anterograde amnesia, a consequence of the interruption of the hippocampomammillo-thalamo-cortical circuit. Posterior to the corpus callosum is a cause of foreign hand syndrome. This syndrome corresponds to the occurrence, outside of visual control, of involuntary movements of the nondominant upper limb. This member is perceived as foreign and an intermanual conflict may result [2].
Computed tomography (CT) misses 76% of the positive cases on the MRI carried out 24 hours from the onset of symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging, in particular flair, diffusion, perfusion, and spectroscopy sequences allow the diagnosis by showing hypersignal flair and diffusion of the corpus callosum (CC) with collapse of blood flow and volume at this level and a significant lactate peak in spectroscopy [3].
Differential diagnosis focuses on neoplastic lesions with a clear predominance of glioblastomas (GBM) and lymphomas. Primary lymphoma and glioblastoma multiforme have a particular tropism for the periventricular white matter and the corpus callosum. These lesions take on the contrast and readily include areas of necrosis (essentially in the event of underlying immunosuppression for the lymphoma). In MRI spectroscopy, these lesions include an elevation of the choline peak and often a peak of lactates and lipids [4]. On perfusion imaging, glioblastoma usually shows increased blood flow. In addition, these richly cellular lesions are often hyperintense on diffusion imaging with a decrease in the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Conclusion
The involvement of the corpus callosum can stem from various causes and presents challenges in clinical diagnosis due to its variable nature. It is rarely isolated, often associated with other cerebromedullary lesions. Brain MRI, possibly supplemented by spinal MRI, constitutes the erence examination for the exploration of the corpus callosum and for the study of the different pathologies that may affect it.
REFERENCES
1.
Béjot Y, Didi Roy R, Rouaud O, et al. Clinical and radiological appearance of corpus callosum infarctions. Neurological Review 2007;163(4 suppl 1):16.
2.
Moser T, Gauthier-Lasalarié P, Kohlmann R, Blanc S, Bintner M. Isolated infarct of the corpus callosum: A misleading appearance. [Article in French]. J Neuroradiol 2008;35(3):181–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
3.
Park SE, Choi DS, Shin HS, et al. Splenial lesions of the corpus callosum: Disease spectrum and MRI findings. Korean J Radiol 2017;18(4):710–21. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
4.
Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology 2005;235(3):985–91. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Author Contributions
Sara Habib Chorfa - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Soumia El Graini - Acquisition of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Kenza Sidki - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Firdaous Touarssa - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Mohamed Jiddane - Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Data Availability StatementThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Consent For PublicationWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Competing InterestsAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2024 Sara Habib Chorfa et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.